Mason Tran Mrs

Mason Tran
Mrs. Dzul-Baron
English 2
16 November 2018
How does Paul help emphasize the theme?
“You must not fight too often with one enemy, or you will teach him all your art of war” -Napoleon. All Quiet on the Western Front shows Paul Bäumer’s experiences and fears in World War I. The terrifying sights of war forced the men to grown instincts and learn to stay together as a group. Paul volueneerly joins the army with some of his friends from school and inspired by there teacher Kantorek. Paul soon recieves a letter from the company telling that after two weeks only 80 men will return and the rest of 150 men will stay. Remarque uses the setting to emphasize the theme in many different ways.
Erich focuses on Paul emphasizing the theme. For example he uses him on the Effect of War on the Soldier. Paul is traumatized with being on the front lines of the war. It also shows when he gets home. He can’t remember anything. He goes home and looks around and see a lot of new stuff, but really it is the old stuff that he had but the war changed his mind. Also the men are put in dirty conditions filled with rats. They also don’t get much food within days. “Katczinsky is right when he says it would not be such a bad war if only one could get a little more sleep. In the line we have next to none, and fourteen days is a long time at one stretch.” (1.5) The men have gone fourteen days without sleep. It is possible to lose memory for not sleeping for more than 10 days. Remarque uses the effect of the conditions to overload the soldiers of their mental feelings. Remarques point of view has a disconnection and has had a huge impact on the men’s humanity. Even Paul sometimes can’t imagine a future without having war to recollect how he felt before. He additionally loses his capacity to address his family.
Nationalism, it shows how those in strength and power can control nation’s. Paul and his friends are wanting to join the armed force, however the experience of killing somebody is horrifying. Remarque shows that soldiers on the front lines not for the greatness of their country yet rather for their own survival they execute to keep from being slaughtered. “It’s queer, when one thinks about it, we are here to protect our fatherland. And the French are over there to protect their fatherland. Now who’s in the right?” Paul and his companions don’t view the contradicting armed forces as their genuine adversaries in their view, their genuine foes are the men in power in their own country, who they accept have them to the war basically to expand their very own capacity and brilliance.
Another case of warfare comes as the educator Kantorek. As a classroom instructor is diverted by patriotism and excitement for the war exertion. He has no immediate involvement with war yet hotly lectures about obligation to one’s nation. Instructors like Kantorek have power and impact over youthful personalities. As a student, the storyteller Paul confided in Kantorek and trusted him to be sharp. He does battle idealistic and putting stock in it’s motivation. Subsequent to encountering the mercilessness of the bleeding edges direct, he sharply ponders the distinction between the truth of war and the hopeful vision sold to susceptible young fellows by individuals they believed who ended up having no immediate learning of the capacity, reason, or truth of war. “My thoughts become confused. This atmosphere of carbolic and gangrene clogs the lungs, it is a thick gruel, it suffocates (2.37).” War assaults the majority of the people and it’s noticeable all around the fighters inhale and the smell of enduring they hear, in the unpleasant earth and fragments they feel in the trenches.
In spite of the fact that Paul frequently dreams about his life before the war, he realizes that he can stay away for the indefinite future to it. The war has pulverized a whole age of young fellows, abandoning them “lost” physically and mentally mangled and unfit to rearrange to their past lives. Regardless of whether they figure out how to endure the trenches, the things they have seen and done there have for all time changed them. Paul encounters the jostling impacts of this change most plainly when he quickly comes back to his home town on leave. The town has not changed, yet Paul understands totally of place there. His old advantages in writing and craftsmanship, spoken to by the racks of books in his youth room, now appear to be whimsical and incredible. At the point when his leave closes, Paul is nearly soothed to come back to the front. His outing home fortifies his conviction that the war has made an unbridgeable gap between the young fellows who battle and the networks they have deserted.